Search TekSocial
Stay Connected

Enter your email address:

(We respect your privacy!)

Or subscribe with your favorite RSS Reader

  

Entries in Steve Jobs (35)

2:44AM

Steve Jobs Anecdotes: The Dark Side

There are some devout groups of people, that don’t give a hoot about Apple’s darkling mischiefs, as if they were swirled into the vortex of a latrine and flushed there. Apple’s success and pride come with audacious undertakings. iPhone, iPod, and Mac to name a few. And beyond the scope of doubts is the absolute Stradivarius of a quality these Apple gimmicks entail. To attack Apple for its quality is a charade in a modern sense, and it shall be fraught with thorough vetting. And what has passed through the infundibuliform funnel of public deception, and beyond the spark of doubt, may be Steve Jobs’s sterilized reputation as a good, benignant, man. Every once in a while, he brings the media attendance, and public eyes to a powwow, geyser up some motivational parlance and attitudes, while we glaze over his newest inventions with chortling crackles. Great rumpus, and great atmosphere. 

However, the time has come, at which the celluloid has tripped itself up. Steve Jobs tripped up, Apple tripped up. I’m assured, as you were shim sham shimmying through the web, you’ve come across some reports of Steve Jobs’s reproving reaction to some of Apple’s failures: MobileMe. In its early stage, MobileMe was insured to establish a seamless wireless syncing over-the-air. Apple began comparing this nascent platform with the likes of Microsoft Exchange and Google Sync, both of which their respective features and availabilities are succulent to business and casual users alike. A mottled MobileMe, all tousled and corrugated, in return, when it plodded through its final stage before the launch, sputtered out nothing but genuine flackery. It served as a firetrap of blazing oversights, and nothing else. If something were deservingly flung into a toilet, that should be MobileMe. MobileMe is just like Europe, where people pay to use a john. Why does anyone need to pay for email and some sparse cloud storage? 

Recent anecdote reveals the swarthy complexion of Steve Jobs that’s hidden beneath his sterile turtleneck. His well-groomed nature is well-known. So, why don’t I flick the ripcord and show you what the anecdote has for us: 

Jobs: "Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?" Having received a satisfactory answer, he continues, "So why the f*** doesn't it do that?"

Interestingly, the disclosure of this excerpt was met with some rarefied air, I think, for Jobs isn’t met with harsh words on an open bank of technology congeries. The old dictum, “one swallow doesn’t make a summer” rules all the odds here. For some occult reasons, similar issues are brought up, as to rip his reputation apart, and every time, he summons a berserk fan-base to defend himself. These are the “swallow.” The summer has never come. Steve Jobs is like a hotshot impresario. He sells, and thrives well beyond the troposphere of Wealth. Like all those garbage flicks and Vin Diesel movies, he has not but a sole resolve to entertain people, and wow them. He does this all the time with his aplomb and experience, which are embedded in his blood, and on an intravenous scale. And reeling the lines of the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, one might discover the derivatives of all those ghoulish attitudes toward Apple. See, when these 12 Angry Men start to think over this and mould their unusually glutinous thoughts, they’d come up with 12 different reasons, trifle ones. Apple’s expensive, Steve Jobs is an unctuous geezer, Phil Schiller is resolving into a delusional Jules Winnfield. Those are wild, dirty, accusations to deploy. 

On the flip side, those may be Steve Jobs’s temperament and mechanization of human employees at Apple that led Apple to the crawl way toward the right direction. Apple’s like Lionel Logue, amending and thatching all the technological wounds that have been inflicted in the War against anachronistic, stale, developments. Our technology is moving toward the way where it should be directed to, until it’s skeet shot by newer and epochal charms of technology foundations. 

Or maybe, this callous reaction to such an outrageous disclosure may hold its answer out of a mail-sorting cubicle. Who knows? I personally find this excerpt that uncovers the cloak-and-dagger Steve Jobs has been living under. He’s just another corporate high-ups with a majestical talent of pretending, and knack of prolixity. Some may find his outrage amusing. But the truth of the matter is the team that had been involved with the first generation MobileMe was effectively fired, and unrightfully so. While he’s noshing on a sinker, those laid off are sniveling. Perhaps not. But this is the nature of Steve Jobs. He may be a phantasmagorical Messiah, or a chameleon-eyed Xavi. But there’s a dark side to him. Not a “silent guardian, or a watchful protector,” but a Hannibal-like complexion. 

Look, I’m not trying to flagellate Mr. Jobs until he bellows for clemency. He’s a true visionary, he knows that the world swirls around an axis at 23.5 degrees. And look, he’s a ruddy man with an impressive mouthpiece. But when are we going to question his scruples, as the passel does it so well with Ballmer and Blatter. And look for the final time. Apple’s not going to clench on the rein forever, as there’s a cycle. If you’re clever enough, technology moves forward in two shakes of a lamb’s tail. When Steve Jobs’s dark side looms, and Apple quails in apprehension, that is when its golden era shalt end. The past dallies past each other’s past. But I’d want to suppose my point has been proven and “justice has been done.” Don’t be fooled by his dowdy dissemblance, and make a room for yourself to decide. Does he really have a dark side? Is Catch-22 unjustified? Yawn

7:44PM

“The Apple Never Falls Far From the Tree”

The first Greek philosophers were astronomers, reining the realms of science and logic, as if they were improvidently subpoenaed before the judgement seat at Tucson, until they were shot down. A wooing of knowledge gave way for philosophy and reality to outshine. Likewise, no one individual, and even a pool of ambitious minds have a sole dominion over technology. One instance, Microsoft is running the Keebler tree, while its golden age is sloping, and concomitantly allowing Apple to take that waffling baton and scurry away from Rube Goldberg machines. So when a news of Jobs’s indefinite absence, and Jony Ive’s potential leave was accounted in a wild retail, I was possessed with a line of thought that Apple may be dismembering from the never-ending horizon of technology, and in the throes of change and reform, who may assume that position? 

I’m not trying to dragoon you into listening Rooster Cogburn talk about elocution, but I do want you to be aware that I’m not writing this under the auspice of Apple. Some lads, while footing their bill for their outstanding payments, would argue Alexander Graham Bell is ahead of anyone else. Can someone shut their collective mouths up, please? Are you there Mr. Gray? Let us resolve in this ethereal parley in the course of stevedores' mouths, all claiming they are seizing on that digitally-synthesized rein. There must be a middle ground, on which everyone would cease their fire, and yelp out: “Apple is burgeoning, at a faster pace than liberalism dying. Apple is on top of the game...” Let’s not mince words here. Apple is either dominating the technological hemisphere, or it is bound to re-invite its fellow corporations into Rockerfeller’s ungentle prowess. And if you do have time to take a stock-taking at the Nielsen Company’s numbers for the “Total U.S. Market & Smartphone Market” at Q4 of 2010, Apple’s iPhone partakes in the 27.9% pie-piece, and speculations show it is making inroads toward the thoroughfare of categorical domination, like it has done with its flagship device: iPod. Indeed, the entire phraseology of “MP3 player” has long been syncopated, and the term “iPod,” has chimed in at the dying note. 

So what would happen when Steve Jobs makes his final advent at one musty press conference, and announces his retirement plan? Would the technological sphere be left nothing but a nubbin of Steve Jobs’s percipient mind? Would the customers be glaring at the competitors’ howler, while they are awaken with a dross of a mind that the Great Visionary is not coming back? Don’t worry. Take a sleuth into the history, and peruse how people have stood up against all odds with stoicism. Look what happened when Bill Gates resigned as a CEO of Microsoft. Microsoft moved on. And Look what happened when the Archies broke up. Never mind.  And finally, look what happened when John Sculley stepped down. Steve Jobs resurged from vacancy and put Apple back at the zenith. So that dalliance of sadness, when bereavement no longer becomes an avoidable factor on a degraded Litmus paper, we will get out of this dampened imbroglio faster than we perceive. Apple may be disemboweled of its cerebrum, but the next visionary will flounce in and replace him. So when a pendulum-like trapeze finally reaches its destination, that is when we move on from crossly examinations of past grievances. For time is immutable, and memory savable, the last breathe of a great visionary will be unperturbed, and we are staid affixed like eyeless loons, as if nothing has ever taken place... 

7:09PM

September iPod Touch Most Likely Without a Rear-Camera

iPod Touch (left) iPhone 4 rear camera (right)

Many rumors have been surfacing the web lately suggesting that we may see a rear-facing camera in the September release of the 4th generation iPod Touch. I'll confirm it right now- we aren't going to see one unless Apple makes some major design changes to this new iPod Touch.

This shouldn't be a surprise to you. Steve Jobs even told the New York Times why:

I also asked him why the Nano can record video, but can't snap still photos. That reason, he said, is technical: the sensors you need to record video are extremely thin these days -- thin enough to fit into the wafer-thin Nano. But the ones with enough resolution for stills, especially with autofocus (like the sensor in the iPhone), are much too thick to cram into a player that's only 0.2 inches thick.

At the WWDC, where iPhone 4 was released, Steve Jobs said they would ship 10s of millions of FaceTime devices. This was clealy hinting that the iPod Touch will include a camera. A front-facing camera that is.

If Apple did want to include a rear-camera on the iPod Touch, we would see a thicker, more squared-off design. Apple is also known for surprises as well. We could also see some new type of technology introduced that allows for a thinner rear- camera. Time will tell. What are your thoughts? Are you expecting a front facing or rear facing camera? Or both?

 

1:50PM

Steve Jobs' Rude Emails with Angry iPhone User Deemed Fake

As some may have heard from numerous tech blog posts, there have been rumors of a disgruntled iPhone 4 user sending emails to Steve Jobs' (sjobs@apple.com) email address about complaints of horrible reception with the new iPhone and how he is being made fun of for choosing that phone that he will be switching to the Droid on Verizon. Supposedly, Steve Jobs counteracted these emails with replies such as "Calm down" and "It's just a phone". Apparently, the emails were first posted on Boy Genius Report and then sold to Apple Insider, not knowing they were Photoshopped!

These chain of fake emails were later exposed by Fortune via knowledge of a top Apple spokesman. In the end, Apple has officially informed bloggers that the emails were a hoax and as we earlier found out today, the iPhone 4's reception issues are a mere "software problem."

For more tech visit: www.tekroundup.com

11:16PM

The New Apple?


Apple has always been determined to make computers for the average person, but, as the average person has changed since the Mac, and even since the iPhone, so has Apple.

Before 1984, the average person was baffled by computers. They were only really used by people who were proficient at the least, and were only in institutions. Apple aimed to change that with their GUI.

Before 2007 cell phones were crap. None of them did everything you wanted. They were either easy to use, with little functionality, or hard to use, with tons of features. The iPhone changed that. 

But now, the average user is a little more computer savvy. They understand the concept of mobile multitasking, the concept of apps running simultaneously, and, in general, people understand more about technology than they did even just 3 years ago. PCs have always been about features, Macs, and all Apple products, have been about ease of use. But As people change, Apple changes too. They have been...

Continued...